Upload a photo Upload a video Upload an mp3 Upload an event


Barnsley Man Charged Following Series Of Burglaries

Thursday October 31 2013

A BARNSLEY man has been charged with burglary and aggravated theft of a vehicle following a spate of burglaries.

Mark Anthony Corbett, 31, from Goldthorpe, was charged on Thursday following a series of thefts in Doncaster.

At around 4.30am on October 30, officers were called to an address in Sprotbrough following the report of a car being stolen.

Corbett was arrested near the address and appeared at Doncaster Magistrates' Court.

He is now on remand in custody until sentencing at Sheffield Crown Court in November.

Leave a comment
comments powered by Disqus
8 Showing 8 comments

Reply Posted by Ian on Thursday October 31 2013 at 18:08
Corbett was arrested near the address and appeared at Doncaster Magistrates' Court.

Some kind of magician!

Reply Posted by sally on Friday November 1 2013 at 00:08
Get him off the streets. Educate the person to work, buy his own car. Its not nice to find your car stolen,more so when you need it for work.

Reply Posted by Mystery on Friday November 1 2013 at 07:06
Technically Goldthorpe has a postal address of Rotherham though Barnsley MBC have the pain of looking after it and its crime problems. Rotherham MBC should be given it as a cost saving

Reply Posted by Mum of Three on Saturday November 2 2013 at 14:18
What a scum bag.
Who do people think they are that they can go and take things that don't belong to them.
Both me and my husband work hard and we are still struggling to make ends meet.
It makes me sick to think that these people think they can carry on like this.

Reply Posted by X on Sunday November 3 2013 at 19:29
Hang the ****

Reply Posted by Swifty on Sunday November 3 2013 at 19:33
Saudi Arabia comes to my mind.

Reply Posted by Leek on Tuesday November 5 2013 at 08:16
Watched a video on Facebook other day of a thief in Jordan having his fingers chopped off with an axe!!! Just saying like ;o)

Reply Posted by Richard on Tuesday November 5 2013 at 10:14
WAB- why is it when this guy is remanded in custody and the finger more strongly points towards this guy actually committing the crime do you refrain from giving his address details, yet when someone is only suspected of rape do you publish his address details? Bit inconsistent and grossly unfair wouldn't you say?

In any case, until someone has been tried before a judge and jury and subsequently convicted should you morally release any such details. Shameful.

ipso Regulated